‘Minimalism,’ sometimes also referred to as ‘Reductivism,’ ‘Literalist Art,’ ‘Rejective Art,’ or ‘ABC Art,’ emerged away from a fancy wave that swept the globe, especially the USA, in the 1960s. ‘Minimalism,’ because the name suggests, will be the art, of any type, which thrives on minimizing any symbol of individual expression. The term is frequently applied to the works of visual artists, composers, writers, playwrights, filmmakers, and choreographers, who seem to believe, “less is a lot more.” In accord, ‘Minimalists’ strip about the composition of all the so-called elements right down to their most rudimentary forms, in ways rejecting the requirement of social comment and other references to history, politics, or religion.



‘Minimalism’ pointed in the post World War II era, being a reaction for the excesses of ‘Emotionalism’ of ‘Abstract Art’ on exaggerated canvases, sculptures, and installations. ‘Minimalism’ is loosely in line with the reductive areas of ‘Modernism,’ often bridging between ‘Modernism’ and ‘Post-Modernism.’ Russian ‘Suprematists’ as Kasimir Malevich influenced ‘Minimalism.’ Which also include Donald Judd, Agnes Martin, Robert Morris, and Frank Stella. In the United States, the movement emerged when Frank Stella exhibited his “Black Paintings” in the Modern Art Museum in New York, in 1959.

‘Minimalism’ entails drawing straight geometrical forms, such to be a square or even a rectangle in a very repetitive fashion. It employs the solid plane of colours with uniform & stable chromaticity, straight from the palette. A ‘Minimalist’ wants the observers to perceive only what exactly is in front of them, without attempting any philosophical or creative digging. This helps generate an unadulterated viewer’s reaction to the art objects.


‘Minimalism’ describes a few more art forms also, like music, design & architecture, and literature. The simplicity plus the objectivity of ‘Minimal Art’ allows it to become one in the truest along with the purest sorts of creativity, a long way away from pretense. This simplicity as well as the lack of expression, however, is also among the gripes most critics have against ‘Minimalism,’ and in addition, they often brush it off being a passing fad. They insist that art should act being a means to objectivity, where there should be an account balance between form and function, while using central focus being the portrayal of meaningful experiences.


Despite the many criticisms, ‘Minimalism’ would be the source of many simple and neutral art movements, like ‘process Art,’ ‘Land Art,’ ‘Pop Art,’ ‘Performance Art,’ ‘Conceptual Art,’ and ‘Installation Art.’ Undoubtedly, ‘Minimal Art’ is really a highly successful phase of creativity, and has now well leveraged the shaping of the twentieth-century art.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *